By Jim Meyers
The House Judiciary Committee is launching a probe into Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan's prior involvement with
healthcare reform legislation that could determine she must recuse herself from future high court deliberations on Obamacare.
When President Barack Obama signed the healthcare bill into law, Kagan was still
serving as his Solicitor General and was responsible for defending the administration's position in federal court cases.
In one series of email exchanges between Kagan and staffers, her top deputy says
about legal challengers to Obamacare: "Let's crush them."
A
federal law prohibits a Supreme Court justice from judging a case if while in previous government service he or she served
as counsel or adviser on the case or expressed an opinion about its merits, CNS News reported.
The Judiciary Committee investigation follows up on a letter sent by 49 members of the House to House Judiciary Committee
Chairman Lamar Smith, R-Texas, and ranking Democrat John Conyers of Michigan on June 24. It called on the committee "to
promptly investigate the extent to which U.S. Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan was involved in preparing a legal defense
of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) during her tenure as solicitor general."
Chairman Smith sent a letter to Attorney General Eric Holder:
"On June
24, 2011, I received the enclosed letter from 49 Members of Congress. On their behalf, I write to request relevant documents
and witness interviews in order to properly understand U.S. Supreme Court Associate Justice Elena Kagan's involvement in health
care legislation or litigation while serving as United States solicitor general.
"In recent weeks, questions have been raised about whether Justice Kagan's prior work on what became the Patient
Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) while serving as solicitor general should disqualify her from hearing challenges
to its constitutionality.
"All parties agree the critical
question is the extent of her involvement, as solicitor general, in formulating the administration's legal position on PPACA,
which was signed into law by President Obama on March 23, 2010."
On that day, Virginia and Florida filed suits challenging the constitutionality of the law. President Obama would
not nominate Kagan for the Supreme Court until seven weeks later.
The
letter from the 49 House members pointed to documents released by the Justice Department in response to a Freedom of Information
Act request from CNSNews.com on May 25, 2010.
One item released
by the DOJ is an email chain showing that on Jan. 8, 2010, then-Solicitor General Kagan assigned her top deputy, Neal Katyal,
to handle the expected lawsuits against Obamacare, and that Katyal informed the Associate Attorney General's office that Kagan
"definitely" wanted her office involved in this issue.
Brian
Hauck, the senior counsel to Associate Attorney General Tom Perrelli, emailed Katyal to tell him that Perrelli wanted "to
put together a group to get thinking about how to defend against the inevitable challenges to the healthcare proposals that
are pending."
Katyal replied: "Absolutely right on.
Let's crush them. I'll speak to [Solicitor General] Elena [Kagan] and designate someone."
Kagan instantly assigned Katyal.
Chairman Smith's letter
to Holder includes a request to interview Katyal.
During Kagan's
confirmation hearings in the Senate Judiciary Committee, which began on June 28, 2010, Republicans asked her if she had ever
been "asked about your opinion regarding the underlying legal or constitutional issues related to any proposed healthcare
legislation ... or the underlying legal or constitutional issues related to potential litigation resulting from such legislation."
They also asked her whether she had "ever offered any views or comments" on those subjects.
Kagan answered both questions: "No."
On July
20, 2010, the Judiciary Committee voted 13-6 to recommend Kagan's confirmation to the full Senate. On Aug. 5, the Senate confirmed
her nomination by a vote of 63-37. She was sworn in on Aug. 7.
Chairman
Smith gave the Justice Department a July 29 deadline to produce the documents it has requested.
[© Newsmax. All rights reserved. Saturday, 16 Jul 2011 01:49 PM]