By R Vaidyanathan
It is no more a question of if, but when. My assessment is that there will be a Talibanized government in Pakistan
within two to three years, after a prolonged civil war. Pakistan is currently a ferocious Doberman held on a leash by the
US, and fed with exotic bones. It was meant to bark at and bite the USSR (and India) when the Cold War was on, but the US
realized recently that the dog has developed rabies and has become ferocious enough to bite the owner and the neighbors.
The US has no clue on what to do with its rabid canine. Running away from it is
one option. The other is to try its best to force India, the eastern neighbor, to distract it with more bones like joint sovereignty
of Jammu & Kashmir. The hope is that the dog will be distracted enough to allow the US to make its getaway from Afghanistan.
Whatever the scenario, the net result will be an increasingly Talibanized Pakistan.
The problems faced by Pakistan are of its own making. It sees itself as a leader of the Islamic world. One Egyptian
professor told me after visiting Pakistan in the 1990s that they gave him the impression that Islam was invented on August
14, 1947. During the recent Facebook prophet controversy, it was Pakistan which banned all internet media - something that
wasn't done by many countries even in the Middle East.
Some
sections of Pakistani society have embarked on a dangerous path of searching for ‘pure' Islam. First, they targeted
Hindus and Christians using blasphemy laws. Then they targeted Ahmaddiyas (or Ahmadis) by declaring them to be non-Muslims.
The grave of Abdus Salam says he is the "First Nobel laureate in physics," with the word "Islamic" being
deleted after the word "first."
For some radical Sunnis,
Shias are ‘less than pure' Muslims. More recently, Sufis have been targeted. When Ahmaddiyas were butchered recently,
the media categorized them as a religious sect and many "experts" absurdly argued that all this was done by the
Ahmaddiyas themselves to abrogate the blasphemy laws which had banned them from calling themselves Muslims.
Pakistan is thus close to civil war.
Pakistan's finance ministry (May 24, 2009) said that terror costs the country more than US$ 35 billion; but it is
not clear whether this figure includes the amounts spent on instigating terror in Kashmir valley and in other parts of the
world. Khaled Ahmed had given an estimate that Pakistan pays into Kashmir around US$ 2.6 billion annually to keep the All
Party Hurriyat Conference (APHC) and other radical organizations alive. This also includes an "infiltration budget."
Pakistan gets around 800 "incursions" annually for this money.
The economy of Pakistan, mostly owned by the Army and completely dependent on US crumbs, is in a shambles. Singapore
Airlines has closed shop and three foreign institutional investors (FIIs) who set up offices some years ago have closed down.
The elites are trying to emigrate to the West after going through special ID checks.
India does not comprehend the impending denouement in the terrorist state of Pakistan. We absurdly mouth the belief
that the rabid Doberman is also a "victim" of terrorism and conduct talks with political leaders who do not wield
any real power in Pakistan - as the shenanigans of Foreign Minister SM Qureshi in the recent India-Pakistan talks show. If
at all, India should talk directly to Ashfaq Kayani, the Army Chief, and Shuja Ahmed, the ISI Chief. But even they are unlikely
to be able to control the Army as the cadre that grew up during the Zia ul-Haq regime is now reaching the top. Their allegiance
may be to Wahabi Islam, and not necessarily to the Pakistani state or Army. They want to erase their Indic past and the primary
purpose of existence is the destruction of India or become its equal.
The Indo-Pak hyphenation is gone in global discussions and Pakistan's problems are not discussed, but Pakistan is
recognized as a global headache. Of course, they will, as usual, argue with the US even though a pistol is held to their own
head, but declining powers like the US can only bribe and beg with these blackmailers.
India should keep quiet and our civil society should avoid links with that medieval monster, especially if a Taliban
government gets formed in Pakistan. It may take few years for such a government to implement its ideology. Some Wagah candle-kissers
may want India to help the liberal society of Pakistan, but liberals are trying to leave Pakistan.
There is a possibility of Pakistanis trying to migrate to India, but efforts should be made to keep them on the other
side of the border. A stable Pakistan is more dangerous to India than a dynamic disequilibrium. As long as there is internal
strife and civil war they will be very busy wallowing in their own mess. Any stability will make them look East.
[R. Vaidyanathan is a Professor of finance at the Indian Institute of Management,
Bangalore (Bengaluru), India. He can be reached at
Vaidya@iimb.ernet.in]